The most 5 Common Roulette Myths and Judi Slot
Roulette is one of the oldest casino games. It has its origins
in the 18th century and was developed by Blaise Pascal. Roulette is the French
word meaning little wheel. For as long as the game has been around there have
been people who have claimed that they can “beat the wheel.” Ed Thorp and
Claude Shannon developed the first wearable computer in that was used to
predict wear the ball would land. Others took the success of the Thorp/Shannon
initiative and used it to develop scaled down and non-computer based methods of
predicting the final resting basket of the ball. The degree at which each is
successful vary greatly. The best system I have seen in print is the
Professional Roulette Prediction series by Laurence Scott. With the success of
the time tested professional players and mathematicians there is a group of
people that take observations out of context and make broad and vague
assertions. I will take a look at some of the more outrageous roulette myths
and debunk why they are so absurd. For further advance roulette strategy
reading, you can visit Frank Scoblete’s Ultimate Roulette Strategy Guide, that
he published exclusively at 888casino.com
The most 5 Common Roulette Myths
Myth 1
Myth: The outcome of the previous spin impact the outcome of
the next spin?
This misconception is widely popular among
tourist and novice gamblers. Many amateur roulette players have likely seen
only 1500-2000 croupier spins over their playing time. Most of these have been
on different wheels and by different croupiers. Even if a player were to record
the numbers that come up, and if the number set were to show a biased toward a
specific octant -a group of 8 numbers that are adjacent to one another on the JudiSlot wheel, the information would not be significant for a few reasons.
The first reason is that result of the outcome is dependent on
numerous physical characteristics. Some are dealer dependent and some are
characteristics of the wheel itself. In addition to these, there are other
variables that are not even considered. These included elevation, humidity, and
rotation of the earth and gravitational forces. In order for the set of numbers
to show any reasonable conclusions the data set would have to be in the
neighborhood of 30,000 spins, all under the exact same conditions. This is
impossible.
Truth: The previous spin does not affect the outcome of the
next spin over the long term.
Myth 2
Myth: All Roulette Wheels behave in the same
The assertion that all roulette wheels behave the same way is
the most amusing assertion I’ve heard. Considering there are 2 versions a
roulette wheel, an American wheel: where there are a 0 and a 00 basket and a
European wheel: where there is only a 0 basket, the very nature of the
duplicity leads any reasonable person to conclude their must be at least two
versions. The American wheel has 38 slots and carries a house edge of 5.25%.
The single zero roulette wheel has a house edge of 2.7%. The very nature of the
different number of slots dictates that the behavior is different.
The physical characteristics of the wood and steel used on the
wheels vary from wheel to wheel. The different in the coefficients of friction
and tensile strengths vary slightly per batch. The slight differences in the
physical property of the materials used do not individually make a difference
but when combined with all the other variances the result becomes logarithmic.
It is very likely that 2 wheels produced on the same day by the same person
will be very different.
Comments
Post a Comment